Sunday, November 6, 2016

Stop Humbling, Start Crying

I know that our nation is in distress. We are facing one of the most difficult times we've seen. We are being  fed lies daily by the media that is unashamedly pulling for one candidate while spewing fallacies about the other. Hillary Clinton is a criminal worthy of being called a mafia crime boss. Her  guilt is obvious, she has lied in front of a federal investigation and gotten away with it. She and her husband are over a "foundation" that is nothing but a money laundering scheme. She is blatantly evil. Yet, we see hardly anything but false images spread by the leftist media. Worse yet, her own followers spew the same lies and call you a sexist if you don't accept them.

What do we need in this nation? God. One of Gods important attributes is justice. He is a Just God. His morals and justice cannot be swayed by popular opinion, underhanded dealings, political correctness, or the lies of rhetoric propaganda.

I keep seeing Christians post 2 Chronicles 7:14: and My people who are called by My name humble themselves, pray and seek My face, and turn from their evil ways, then I will hear from heaven, forgive their sin, and heal their land.

While I completely agree with the passage, I disagree with the sentiment by the Christians. We, the true body of Christ, have turned to Him and have humbled ourselves. We will continue to do so, that is not the issue, it is the right thing to do. But, there should be more. God wants us to pray, He wants to hear us. So, is there something we should say beyond humbly asking forgiveness?

There is...

We need to be on our knees, crying out for justice. Our own justice system has been so corrupted by the left that we cannot expect honest judgment in cases involving people like Clinton, Obama, or any other powerful democrat. We see people who are oppressed and suppressed, controlled and ignored. The common, average citizen does not receive honest justice, we now fear our own government.

We need to look at Psalm 10: 17-18 LORD, You have heard the desire of the humble; You will strengthen their hearts. You will listen carefully, 18 doing justice for the fatherless and the oppressed so that men of the earth may terrify them no more.

and

Psalm 34:51 The eyes of the LORD are toward the righteous And His ears are open to their cry.

When God intervened for his followers in the Old Testament, he spoke of how he heard their cries. He brought them out of bondage to Egypt because he heard their cries. We are not in bondage like they were, we still have enough freedom to count ourselves blessed. But, there are people who would take it from us, piece by piece. Our way of life, our freedom, will be overthrown not by a quick battle, but by a slow progression of amoral laws and slimy dictators who call themselves progressive. They will replace what is right with what is wrong. It is our duty to fight back, but we don't need to pick up weapons, we need to be on our knees. The armies our God commands are stronger and swifter than anything man has or will ever have.

Cry, body of Christ, cry for justice to the God who is perfectly just.

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

I'm not boycotting Target, but I refuse to shop there


Okay, you may wonder what's the difference between boycotting and plain refusal to patronize a store. The difference is in why I enact my beliefs.

Let me start by explaining my beliefs. I am an evangelical Christian and go to a Southern Baptist Church. I believe in the whole Bible and that it is the true word of God handed down through divinely inspired authors. I have faith in Jesus Christ as my savior and that without Jesus I cannot hope to have salvation and forgiveness of my sins. That said, it is my responsibility to live according to the scriptures in this life as best as I can. I know that I am not perfect and I will often stumble. I know that though I am forgiven, I will still sin and that is wrong. I also know that according to the scriptures, it is my duty to acknowledge sin and help the lost know what sin is so that they too can seek forgiveness of their transgressions against their creator. (Don't start throwing “judge not” in my face, that is a horribly misquoted passage and we are called to judge...but that is another article.)
With my beliefs placed on the solid foundation of the Scriptures, I know that homosexuality is a sin and I know that the whole transgender movement is a sin. I will not ignore that. I will not be silent on that. If I did not tell them what God says about their lifestyles, then I am guilty of silence. If a doctor withheld the news that you had cancer, he would be guilty of letting you die without giving you the chance to seek healing.

Okay, that all said. I am not basing my personal problems with Targets choice on the fact that the LGBT movement is Biblically wrong. In fact, who I am worried about aren't the transgender people, but those who are perverted scum. The problem with this whole bathroom argument is that one side continues to ignore the consequences of their actions. They want to appeal to those who feel better for accommodating a tiny portion of our society. They ignore the fact that bathrooms, fitting rooms, and locker rooms are not as secure as public areas. We don't want cameras in these locations, they are designed for privacy. We don't want armed guards standing around, again we want privacy. Unfortunately, by opening the doors to ignoring biologic gender policy, we allow perverted people access to these unsecured locations. It has happened before and it will happen again. Yes, it happened before places began to have these policies, but this only allows it to grow exponentially.
The base question that no one on the pro-trans side seems to want to answer is this; “Can you definitively tell the difference between true transgender men and perverted men willing to wear a dress to get closer to their victims?” The answer is a resounding “no you can't” So, I personally believe these policies are more than foolish, they are downright dangerous. In an attempt to appeal to the polarized ideological side of America (the tiny population of transgender people and the larger population of those who feel righteous by supporting them) Target and other organizations are creating a dangerous situation.

Now, my personal beliefs do not allow me to patronize a place that would do this. I do not wish to show any sort of support to a business that would be so foolish. By walking in that door, the world sees that I do not care that they are doing this. However, I also find those who are boycotting based on religious doctrine to be equally foolish. Recently a woman made the news by marching through Target, waving a bible around, and righteously denouncing them and their actions. This does not help the Christian community, it hurts it. I am tired of seeing my Facebook friends and church friends calling out Target for opposing God. The last time I checked, Target wasn't pro-God to begin with. They aren't a church, they aren't a Christian company, they are an independent business. Not only that, but over the last ten or so years they have come out strongly Liberal in their attitudes and policies, this is only a recent development in their actions.

What has happened is that the Left has created both sides of the argument for us. The argument: pro-trans vs. pro-God. Of course that sort of debate is immediately won with the statement “your religion shouldn't dictate how I run my business”. Which has validity. In the long run, when this boils down to writing a law to force trans-gender bathrooms everywhere, it will stand up in the supreme court. The liberal side will argue that any opposition to it is purely religious and thus violates the supposed separation of church and state. The problem is that the argument really isn't about God or the Bible. It's about the dangers of perverted people abusing these new rules to film, fondle and/or rape women and children. As I said, the question they don't want to answer (mentioned in previous paragraph) is avoided entirely when they pose this straw-man argument about why this is somehow related to the Bible and God. And, to make their point work for them, fools march around Target with Bibles in their hands and notable Christians take to the airwaves to connect this policy with Gods moral laws.

We need to stand up against these rules and the laws they will try to pass for the reason of safety, not religion. I won't join they boycott because it's ideology has been designed by its own opposition. However, I won't go to Target because I still firmly believe their policy is flat-out wrong. In the end I do stand with God on this, the Bible is about morals, but it is also about common sense, which is exactly what this whole situation lacks on both sides.

Thank You


Friday, October 11, 2013

This White House is ridiculous.

In an attempt to make the shutdown as painful as possible, the White House is going out of its way to block access to public memorials and national parks.   They not only closed Mount Rushmore, but they actually placed cones along open, public roads to prevent visitors from pulling off to take pictures of the mountain.  It's like that everywhere.  Hundreds of miles away, this administration even sent troopers to try and close Mount Vernon – they found out the hard way that Mount Vernon is privately funded.

Make no mistake, their actions are blatantly political.  They are spending more money to keep people out of open air parks and mountain roads than they would have spent during a normal day.  Just like closing the White House to tours a few months ago, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt.

While Republicans have passed measure-after-measure to keep these parts of the government running, the Democrats continue to stand in the way.  President Obama has even said he'd veto all of these bills to fund the parks; while simultaneously releasing political ads talking about how bad Republicans are for keeping them closed.  Blatant hypocrisy.

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Fight to defund continues.

If something is good for everyone, why would those who are handing it out refuse to take it themselves? If you haven't heard several Republican's in the Senate are filibustering the vote on defunding Obamacare because they know that Reid will do his best to take the vote quickly to protect Obamacare. As it stands, the House has overwhelmingly voted to defund this disastrous bill, but Reid will push the Senate to keep it because he and his cronies want to help destroy this country under this horrible monster of a bill.

The question that not one of my Liberal friends seems to have a logical answer for is why the Dems have exempted themselves from this bill. We are being fed a constant supply of lies from the left by their pretty face mouthpieces. Billy Clinton is now back on the road to give big speeches about why we should just LOVE Obamacare. Obama has even drafted celebs to travel around as well to make the case for it to the American public. What they aren't talking about is that Obama, Clinton, and every other Dem are exempt from the bill they are trying to promote.(As well as Democrat backers who greased enough palms to get their own free ticket away from Obamacare)

Why is it? Why won't they take their own pill? The Democrat News Network known as CNN has been trashing the Repubs on this for years. Yet, again, they won't answer this one question.

One answer that has been used is that the Dems being part of government already have healthcare so they won't need it anyway. Well, that argument fails miserably. We were promised that we could keep our healthcare even with Obamacare in action. So if you can keep your care then you shouldn't need a waiver.

Let me venture a guess as to why Democrats and the big campaign donors of Democrats are waivered. Perhaps this bill isn't what we are being told. Well that should be obvious now considering that we were told that Obamacare would not raise premiums, nope they will raise them significantly. We were told that it would allow you to keep your own healthcare, sorry that's not the case either. We were told it would not raise taxes or cost anything, in fact it would somehow save money. Again, that is entirely false, it is not only going to cost everyone, the Supreme Court ordered Obama to call Obamacare a tax. There are many more, but that should do to make my point. We have been lied to from the beginning about this hideous bill. As I said before, perhaps this bill isn't what we are being told. Perhaps it will hurt people, perhaps it will inflict undue suffering on the American public. But, for those who voted on it and wrote it, they don't have to follow it.

With all the reasons out there to defund Obamacare, the fact that the backstabbing lawmakers who created it are using it to set a very dangerous precedent. Now Lawmakers can write laws they themselves do not need to follow. I will give it a second thought and consider its viability again if Obama and everyone else under his protection removed those waivers and actually faced the bill he helped create. But, I doubt that will happen.

Mr. President, you keep trying to tell us that we need to learn to like it. It will not work. Even if it isn't defunded, we will fight it until it is removed.

Sunday, September 1, 2013

Never said better

A Black Reporter Summarizes Barack

The below summarization of Barack and Michelle Obama’s 5 year reign in the White House is by far the best I’ve ever read as it squarely hits the nail on the head. And it took a black reporter writing it to make it as effective as it is. A white man’s account would be instantly criticized by the liberal media as pure racism. But, how can anyone scream Racist when an exacting description of the Obamas is penned by a well known journalist of color?

BEST SUMMATION OF BARACK AND MICHELLE EVER!
Mychal Massie is a respected writer and talk show host in Los Angeles.

The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn't like the Obama's? Specifically I was asked: "I have to ask, why do you hate the Obama's? It seems personal, not policy related. You even dissed (disrespect) their Christmas family picture."

The truth is I do not like the Obamas, what they represent, their ideology, and I certainly do not like his policies and legislation. I've made no secret of my contempt for the Obamas. As I responded to the person who asked me the aforementioned question, I don't like them because they are committed to the fundamental change of my/our country into what can only be regarded as a Communist state.

I don't hate them per definition, but I condemn them because they are the worst kind of racialists, they are elitist Leninists with contempt for traditional America. They display disrespect for the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit same, Michelle Obama's raw contempt for white America is transpicuous. I don't like them because they comport themselves as emperor and empress.

I expect, no I demand respect, for the Office of President and a love of our country and her citizenry from the leader entrusted with the governance of same. President and Mrs. Reagan displayed an unparalleled love for the country and her people.

The Reagan's made Americans feel good about themselves and about what we could accomplish. Obama's arrogance by appointing 32 leftist czars and constantly bypassing congress is impeachable. Eric Holder is probably the MOST incompetent and arrogant DOJ head to ever hold the job. Could you envision President Reagan instructing his Justice Department to act like jack-booted thugs?

Presidents are politicians and all politicians are known and pretty much expected to manipulate the truth, if not outright lie, but even using that low standard, the Obama's have taken lies, dishonesty, deceit, mendacity, subterfuge and obfuscation to new depths. They are verbally abusive to the citizenry, and they display an animus for civility.

I do not like them, because they both display bigotry overtly, as in the case of Harvard Professor Louis Gates, when he accused the Cambridge Police of acting stupidly, and her code speak pursuant to not being able to be proud of America. I view that statement and that mindset as an insult to those who died to provide a country where a Kenyan, his illegal alien relatives, and his alleged progeny, could come and not only live freely, but rise to the highest, most powerful, position in the world.

Michelle Obama is free to hate and disparage whites because Americans of every description paid with their blood to ensure her right to do same. I have a saying, that "the only reason a person hides things, is because they have something to hide." No president in history has spent millions of dollars to keep his records and his past sealed.

And what the two of them have shared has been proved to be lies. He lied about when and how they met, he lied about his mother's death and problems with insurance, Michelle lied to a crowd pursuant to nearly $500,000 bank stocks they inherited from his family. He has lied about his father's military service, about the civil rights movement, ad nausea. He lied to the world about the Supreme Court in a State of the Union address. He berated and publicly insulted a sitting Congressman. He has surrounded himself with the most rabidly, radical, socialist academicians today.

He opposed rulings that protected women and children that even Planned Parenthood did not seek to support. He is openly hostile to business and aggressively hostile to Israel. His wife treats being the First Lady as her personal American Express Black Card (arguably the most prestigious credit card in the world). I condemn them because, as people are suffering, losing their homes, their jobs, their retirements, he and his family are arrogantly showing off their life of entitlement - as he goes about creating and fomenting class warfare.

I don't like them, and I neither apologize nor retreat from my public condemnation of them and of his policies. We should condemn them for the disrespect they show our people, for his willful and unconstitutional actions pursuant to obeying the Constitutional parameters he is bound by, and his willful disregard for Congressional authority.

Dislike for them has nothing to do with the color of their skin; it has everything to do with their behavior, attitudes, and policies. And I have open scorn for their constantly playing the race card.

I could go on, but let me conclude with this. I condemn in the strongest possible terms the media for refusing to investigate them, as they did President Bush and President Clinton, and for refusing to label them for what they truly are. There is no scenario known to man, whereby a white president and his wife could ignore laws, flaunt their position, and lord over the people, as these two are permitted out of fear for their color.

As I wrote in a syndicated column titled, "Nero In The White House" - "Never in my life, inside or outside of politics, have I witnessed such dishonesty in a political leader. He is the most mendacious political figure I have ever witnessed. Even by the low standards of his presidential predecessors, his narcissistic, contumacious arrogance is unequalled. Using Obama as the bar, Nero would have to be elevated to sainthood...

Many in America wanted to be proud when the first person of color was elected president, but instead, they have been witness to a congenital liar, a woman who has been ashamed of America her entire life, failed policies, intimidation, and a commonality hitherto not witnessed in political leaders. He and his wife view their life at our expense as an entitlement - while America's people go homeless, hungry and unemployed."

Friday, August 9, 2013

Borrow nor a lender be

I read an article written today that was so bleeding heart liberal it hurt. It is about a town in California, Richmond, that is looking at stealing from banks. In fact the article speaks of how the town is going to use massive loopholes to steal a lot of property owned by banks and then sell it at a cut rate to others. Oh, does that sound illegal? It should be and yet the article is praising the town for its forward thinking.

The issue: The town is facing a housing crisis. Many people live in homes they cannot pay for any longer. The Banks are looking at forclosure as is part of the CONTRACT signed by the home owners and the banks. Not satisfied with obeying the legal contract signed by the borrower of the banks money, the people of this town are crying foul. The town counsel in response is using some pretty slimy legal techniques to threaten the banks.

Side Note: The article has a decidedly negative tone when it speaks of the banks, constantly making it known that these banks are owned by Wall Street. The whole tone of the article is David and Goliath, which is false and a horrible spin. Oh, and as icing on the cake, there are several allusions to the "people of color" here, which mean that one way or another the media will play this out like a racial situation.

Back to my rant: The town is giving the Banks two options. 1: Sell the titles to the town, who will then sell them back to the home owners for a cut rate. 2: If the Banks balk at option 1, the town will utilize eminent domain to steal the property and then sell it to the home owners at a cut rate anyway. The article is written to celebrate the forward thinking of this town, as if the town is saving unsuspecting victims from a monster.

Here is the problem: When you borrow from a bank, you are saying that you will eventually pay back what you borrow, with interest. You know that up front and you are aware of the consequences if you do not pay it back. But, instead of facing the consequences, these people are screaming foul on the banks part. They seem to forget that it is the Banks property, not theirs. Until they make the final payment, the Bank is the legal owner of that house and has every right to throw out anyone who isn't paying his/her bills. No one is stealing anything from the home owners, in fact they are stealing from the bank by not paying their bills and threatening the bank with eminent domain.

But, this article is written to play up the town as genius and forward thinking and the Banks as horrid monsters who want to steal candy from babies.

Sorry, you borrowed it, you owe it back. You sign a contract, heaven forbid that someone hold you to it.

I would be most interested in finding out if any of these residents or town counsel had ever lent anything to anyone. I wonder if they wanted it back?

Take a look for yourself, here is the article in question.
https://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/08/07-4

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Full of Hot Air

Full of Hot Air

A woman in a hot air balloon realized she was lost. She lowered altitude and spotted a man in a boat below. She shouted to him, "Excuse me, can you help me? I promised a friend I would meet him an hour ago, but I don't know where I am."
The man consulted his portable GPS and replied, "You're in a hot air balloon approximately 30 feet above a ground elevation of 2,346 feet above sea level. You are 31 degrees, 14.97 minutes north latitude and 100 degrees, 49.09 minutes west longitude."
She rolled her eyes and said, "You must be a Republican."
"I am," replied the man. "How did you know?"
"Well," answered the balloonist, "everything you told me is technically correct, but I have no idea what to make of your information, and I'm still lost. Frankly, you've not been much help to me."
The man smiled and responded, "You must be a Democrat."
"I am," replied the balloonist. "But how did you know?"
"Well," said the man, "You don't know where you are or where you're going. You've risen to where you are due to a large quantity of hot air. You've made a promise that you have no idea how to keep, and now you expect ME to solve your problem. You're in EXACTLY the same position you were in before we met, but somehow, now, it's MY fault.