Friday, October 11, 2013

This White House is ridiculous.

In an attempt to make the shutdown as painful as possible, the White House is going out of its way to block access to public memorials and national parks.   They not only closed Mount Rushmore, but they actually placed cones along open, public roads to prevent visitors from pulling off to take pictures of the mountain.  It's like that everywhere.  Hundreds of miles away, this administration even sent troopers to try and close Mount Vernon – they found out the hard way that Mount Vernon is privately funded.

Make no mistake, their actions are blatantly political.  They are spending more money to keep people out of open air parks and mountain roads than they would have spent during a normal day.  Just like closing the White House to tours a few months ago, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt.

While Republicans have passed measure-after-measure to keep these parts of the government running, the Democrats continue to stand in the way.  President Obama has even said he'd veto all of these bills to fund the parks; while simultaneously releasing political ads talking about how bad Republicans are for keeping them closed.  Blatant hypocrisy.

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Fight to defund continues.

If something is good for everyone, why would those who are handing it out refuse to take it themselves? If you haven't heard several Republican's in the Senate are filibustering the vote on defunding Obamacare because they know that Reid will do his best to take the vote quickly to protect Obamacare. As it stands, the House has overwhelmingly voted to defund this disastrous bill, but Reid will push the Senate to keep it because he and his cronies want to help destroy this country under this horrible monster of a bill.

The question that not one of my Liberal friends seems to have a logical answer for is why the Dems have exempted themselves from this bill. We are being fed a constant supply of lies from the left by their pretty face mouthpieces. Billy Clinton is now back on the road to give big speeches about why we should just LOVE Obamacare. Obama has even drafted celebs to travel around as well to make the case for it to the American public. What they aren't talking about is that Obama, Clinton, and every other Dem are exempt from the bill they are trying to promote.(As well as Democrat backers who greased enough palms to get their own free ticket away from Obamacare)

Why is it? Why won't they take their own pill? The Democrat News Network known as CNN has been trashing the Repubs on this for years. Yet, again, they won't answer this one question.

One answer that has been used is that the Dems being part of government already have healthcare so they won't need it anyway. Well, that argument fails miserably. We were promised that we could keep our healthcare even with Obamacare in action. So if you can keep your care then you shouldn't need a waiver.

Let me venture a guess as to why Democrats and the big campaign donors of Democrats are waivered. Perhaps this bill isn't what we are being told. Well that should be obvious now considering that we were told that Obamacare would not raise premiums, nope they will raise them significantly. We were told that it would allow you to keep your own healthcare, sorry that's not the case either. We were told it would not raise taxes or cost anything, in fact it would somehow save money. Again, that is entirely false, it is not only going to cost everyone, the Supreme Court ordered Obama to call Obamacare a tax. There are many more, but that should do to make my point. We have been lied to from the beginning about this hideous bill. As I said before, perhaps this bill isn't what we are being told. Perhaps it will hurt people, perhaps it will inflict undue suffering on the American public. But, for those who voted on it and wrote it, they don't have to follow it.

With all the reasons out there to defund Obamacare, the fact that the backstabbing lawmakers who created it are using it to set a very dangerous precedent. Now Lawmakers can write laws they themselves do not need to follow. I will give it a second thought and consider its viability again if Obama and everyone else under his protection removed those waivers and actually faced the bill he helped create. But, I doubt that will happen.

Mr. President, you keep trying to tell us that we need to learn to like it. It will not work. Even if it isn't defunded, we will fight it until it is removed.

Sunday, September 1, 2013

Never said better

A Black Reporter Summarizes Barack

The below summarization of Barack and Michelle Obama’s 5 year reign in the White House is by far the best I’ve ever read as it squarely hits the nail on the head. And it took a black reporter writing it to make it as effective as it is. A white man’s account would be instantly criticized by the liberal media as pure racism. But, how can anyone scream Racist when an exacting description of the Obamas is penned by a well known journalist of color?

Mychal Massie is a respected writer and talk show host in Los Angeles.

The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn't like the Obama's? Specifically I was asked: "I have to ask, why do you hate the Obama's? It seems personal, not policy related. You even dissed (disrespect) their Christmas family picture."

The truth is I do not like the Obamas, what they represent, their ideology, and I certainly do not like his policies and legislation. I've made no secret of my contempt for the Obamas. As I responded to the person who asked me the aforementioned question, I don't like them because they are committed to the fundamental change of my/our country into what can only be regarded as a Communist state.

I don't hate them per definition, but I condemn them because they are the worst kind of racialists, they are elitist Leninists with contempt for traditional America. They display disrespect for the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit same, Michelle Obama's raw contempt for white America is transpicuous. I don't like them because they comport themselves as emperor and empress.

I expect, no I demand respect, for the Office of President and a love of our country and her citizenry from the leader entrusted with the governance of same. President and Mrs. Reagan displayed an unparalleled love for the country and her people.

The Reagan's made Americans feel good about themselves and about what we could accomplish. Obama's arrogance by appointing 32 leftist czars and constantly bypassing congress is impeachable. Eric Holder is probably the MOST incompetent and arrogant DOJ head to ever hold the job. Could you envision President Reagan instructing his Justice Department to act like jack-booted thugs?

Presidents are politicians and all politicians are known and pretty much expected to manipulate the truth, if not outright lie, but even using that low standard, the Obama's have taken lies, dishonesty, deceit, mendacity, subterfuge and obfuscation to new depths. They are verbally abusive to the citizenry, and they display an animus for civility.

I do not like them, because they both display bigotry overtly, as in the case of Harvard Professor Louis Gates, when he accused the Cambridge Police of acting stupidly, and her code speak pursuant to not being able to be proud of America. I view that statement and that mindset as an insult to those who died to provide a country where a Kenyan, his illegal alien relatives, and his alleged progeny, could come and not only live freely, but rise to the highest, most powerful, position in the world.

Michelle Obama is free to hate and disparage whites because Americans of every description paid with their blood to ensure her right to do same. I have a saying, that "the only reason a person hides things, is because they have something to hide." No president in history has spent millions of dollars to keep his records and his past sealed.

And what the two of them have shared has been proved to be lies. He lied about when and how they met, he lied about his mother's death and problems with insurance, Michelle lied to a crowd pursuant to nearly $500,000 bank stocks they inherited from his family. He has lied about his father's military service, about the civil rights movement, ad nausea. He lied to the world about the Supreme Court in a State of the Union address. He berated and publicly insulted a sitting Congressman. He has surrounded himself with the most rabidly, radical, socialist academicians today.

He opposed rulings that protected women and children that even Planned Parenthood did not seek to support. He is openly hostile to business and aggressively hostile to Israel. His wife treats being the First Lady as her personal American Express Black Card (arguably the most prestigious credit card in the world). I condemn them because, as people are suffering, losing their homes, their jobs, their retirements, he and his family are arrogantly showing off their life of entitlement - as he goes about creating and fomenting class warfare.

I don't like them, and I neither apologize nor retreat from my public condemnation of them and of his policies. We should condemn them for the disrespect they show our people, for his willful and unconstitutional actions pursuant to obeying the Constitutional parameters he is bound by, and his willful disregard for Congressional authority.

Dislike for them has nothing to do with the color of their skin; it has everything to do with their behavior, attitudes, and policies. And I have open scorn for their constantly playing the race card.

I could go on, but let me conclude with this. I condemn in the strongest possible terms the media for refusing to investigate them, as they did President Bush and President Clinton, and for refusing to label them for what they truly are. There is no scenario known to man, whereby a white president and his wife could ignore laws, flaunt their position, and lord over the people, as these two are permitted out of fear for their color.

As I wrote in a syndicated column titled, "Nero In The White House" - "Never in my life, inside or outside of politics, have I witnessed such dishonesty in a political leader. He is the most mendacious political figure I have ever witnessed. Even by the low standards of his presidential predecessors, his narcissistic, contumacious arrogance is unequalled. Using Obama as the bar, Nero would have to be elevated to sainthood...

Many in America wanted to be proud when the first person of color was elected president, but instead, they have been witness to a congenital liar, a woman who has been ashamed of America her entire life, failed policies, intimidation, and a commonality hitherto not witnessed in political leaders. He and his wife view their life at our expense as an entitlement - while America's people go homeless, hungry and unemployed."

Friday, August 9, 2013

Borrow nor a lender be

I read an article written today that was so bleeding heart liberal it hurt. It is about a town in California, Richmond, that is looking at stealing from banks. In fact the article speaks of how the town is going to use massive loopholes to steal a lot of property owned by banks and then sell it at a cut rate to others. Oh, does that sound illegal? It should be and yet the article is praising the town for its forward thinking.

The issue: The town is facing a housing crisis. Many people live in homes they cannot pay for any longer. The Banks are looking at forclosure as is part of the CONTRACT signed by the home owners and the banks. Not satisfied with obeying the legal contract signed by the borrower of the banks money, the people of this town are crying foul. The town counsel in response is using some pretty slimy legal techniques to threaten the banks.

Side Note: The article has a decidedly negative tone when it speaks of the banks, constantly making it known that these banks are owned by Wall Street. The whole tone of the article is David and Goliath, which is false and a horrible spin. Oh, and as icing on the cake, there are several allusions to the "people of color" here, which mean that one way or another the media will play this out like a racial situation.

Back to my rant: The town is giving the Banks two options. 1: Sell the titles to the town, who will then sell them back to the home owners for a cut rate. 2: If the Banks balk at option 1, the town will utilize eminent domain to steal the property and then sell it to the home owners at a cut rate anyway. The article is written to celebrate the forward thinking of this town, as if the town is saving unsuspecting victims from a monster.

Here is the problem: When you borrow from a bank, you are saying that you will eventually pay back what you borrow, with interest. You know that up front and you are aware of the consequences if you do not pay it back. But, instead of facing the consequences, these people are screaming foul on the banks part. They seem to forget that it is the Banks property, not theirs. Until they make the final payment, the Bank is the legal owner of that house and has every right to throw out anyone who isn't paying his/her bills. No one is stealing anything from the home owners, in fact they are stealing from the bank by not paying their bills and threatening the bank with eminent domain.

But, this article is written to play up the town as genius and forward thinking and the Banks as horrid monsters who want to steal candy from babies.

Sorry, you borrowed it, you owe it back. You sign a contract, heaven forbid that someone hold you to it.

I would be most interested in finding out if any of these residents or town counsel had ever lent anything to anyone. I wonder if they wanted it back?

Take a look for yourself, here is the article in question.

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Full of Hot Air

Full of Hot Air

A woman in a hot air balloon realized she was lost. She lowered altitude and spotted a man in a boat below. She shouted to him, "Excuse me, can you help me? I promised a friend I would meet him an hour ago, but I don't know where I am."
The man consulted his portable GPS and replied, "You're in a hot air balloon approximately 30 feet above a ground elevation of 2,346 feet above sea level. You are 31 degrees, 14.97 minutes north latitude and 100 degrees, 49.09 minutes west longitude."
She rolled her eyes and said, "You must be a Republican."
"I am," replied the man. "How did you know?"
"Well," answered the balloonist, "everything you told me is technically correct, but I have no idea what to make of your information, and I'm still lost. Frankly, you've not been much help to me."
The man smiled and responded, "You must be a Democrat."
"I am," replied the balloonist. "But how did you know?"
"Well," said the man, "You don't know where you are or where you're going. You've risen to where you are due to a large quantity of hot air. You've made a promise that you have no idea how to keep, and now you expect ME to solve your problem. You're in EXACTLY the same position you were in before we met, but somehow, now, it's MY fault.

Monday, July 29, 2013

Suppressing the truth

I had heard from other political pundits recently that Facebook is acting like a good Liberal lapdog. Posts that go against the Liberal media, politicians, or followers mysteriously vanish from Facebook pages. If questioned, Facebook states that it was offensive to some minority or some crap like that. The truth is that Facebook is acting just like the government right now. They are trying to turn truth into a lie by suppressing it. It is just like Atheists who fight against Christians by forcing Christianity to be silent whenever they can. For, Satan hates the truth, it screams like a thousand baby cries in his ears. Obama and his minions are no better.

I posted a video that had to do with the recent George Zimmerman case. This video points out facts that are provable and damaging to the case that the mainstream media is trying to feed us. While the leftist media is attempting to thwart the truth by ignoring the facts and telling us all the lies, the truth is out there and is being made known through the internet. And, this isn't just speculative truth, it is truth based on facts proven by hard evidence. This truth is filled with massive contrasts to what our propaganda artists known as Liberal Journalism are trying to feed us. It paints a picture not of a horrid monster stalking an innocent child to murder him. It is contrary to the notion that Zimmerman was a racists bigot who followed poor Travon to his home to execute him. It destroys the idea that young Travon was a Christlike child who was just being a good boy and was murdered for no reason. I could get into the details, but there is a video that makes all of these points clear and precise.

This video was posted on Youtube and shared around Facebook....for a while. It remains on Youtube, but after I watched is spread among my friends like wildfire last night, it is utterly missing this morning. I know that sometimes posts on facebook can get buried or just be hard to find, but this is highly suspicious the way that it is gone from every page it was on last night. Facebook is at it again, it is holding up the left and their lies while suppressing the truth with considerable consistency.

Here is the video. After you watch it, share it everywhere you can. Let the truth be known!

Friday, June 28, 2013

Racism: where it started and still lives, DEMOCRATS!

When History is taught correctly, the Democrats loose big time on the Racist front. Their party stood for keeping slavery, formed the KKK, worked to keep Blacks segregated, fought against every measure to provide equality. Many of the most notable racists political figures of the nineteenth and twentieth century were hard core Democrats. 

“I’ll have those n*ggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.” — Lyndon B. Johnson to two governors on Air Force One according Ronald Kessler’s Book, “Inside The White House

The Dems passed the wellfare bill not to help those in need, but to buy votes. They knew full well that the majority of the takers would be in the minorities. And that suited them, it kept those minorities in their place according to the Dem's plans. The system is organized in such a meticulous fashion so that if you try to get out of it you are screwed. They have the bar set so that if you get just a little too much outside income they will cut off the support. But, that bar is set so low that you cannot possible support yourself with that new outside income without the aid to continue a little longer. So, you are forced to keep yourself in poverty to keep getting the hand outs or to face extreme poverty if you accidentally try to help yourself. It is a catch-22, you must live in poverty continually to get aid which keeps you poor. Unfortunately the Democrat run school systems have extracted actual math lessons in favor of complicated and unnecessary maths which leave generations of students able to calculate the area of a triangle but not how to balance their check book. Therefore they don't see the fallacies in the system and keep believing that it is the only way to go.  

What do you have instead: Democrat politicians keeping the bloated and out of control wellfare state in operation, working the same way for generations. At the same time they sell their voters the notion that once in office they will fix the system to give MORE money...somehow. They lie out all sides of their face. They pretend that they are with the poor and will take money from the evil rich to make the poor less poor. Yet, those Dems are just as rich, if not richer, than the ones they are calling evil. And, in all these generations of the Wellfare state has one Dem actually done what they The poor stay poor and they stay in the same cyclical system that keeps them poor while always promising to make them rich. 

And, the people that this system has bamboozled most are the minorities. In particular the Black population. They have been sold the idea that it was the Republicans behind all of their troubles. It is the white rich conservatives who keep their students failing, and their children killing each other, and their under-aged girls pregnant, and their money situation bad. Recently the head of the Chicago teachers union, a Black woman, stated that she knows it is the rich whites fault that the black children are failing school. Check the video here. The logic does not make sense and her "evidence" is lacking proof and is full of bigotry toward the whites...yes it is possible to be bigoted toward someone who isn't of a darker hue of skin. And that is what is truly the problem. For generations now the Dems and their loyal, blind followers have just been told what to believe and to believe it without facts or proof. And now they respond to their problems with the same flawed logic, just say it is and it has to be, who needs to prove it. 

Some quotes to help illustrate where the true racism rests in politics:

“I am a former kleagle of the Ku Klux Klan in Raleigh County and the adjoining counties of the state …. The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia …. It is necessary that the order be promoted immediately and in every state of the Union. Will you please inform me as to the possibilities of rebuilding the Klan in the Realm of W. Va …. I hope that you will find it convenient to answer my letter in regards to future possibilities.” — Former Klansman and current US Senator Robert Byrd, a man who is referred to by many Democrats as the “conscience of the Senate”, in a letter written in 1946, after he quit the KKK

“You f*cking Jew b@stard.” — Hillary Clinton to political operative Paul Fray. This was revealed in “State of a Union: Inside the Complex Marriage of Bill and Hillary Clinton” and has been verified by Paul Fray and three witnesses.

“Some junior high n*gger kicked Steve’s ass while he was trying to help his brothers out; junior high or sophomore in high school. Whatever it was, Steve had the n*gger down. However it was, it was Steve’s fault. He had the n*gger down, he let him up. The n*gger blindsided him.” — Roger Clinton, the President’s brother on audiotape

Now I want you to know that not all Democrats are stupid bigoted racist people. It just takes time for some to see what they truly are and where they really want to be. Louisiana State Senator Guillory has officially changed from the Democrat party to the Republican party and he explains why in a video in this link: In encourage you to watch, what he has to say is terrifically important. I pray that all the Democrats with an ounce of conscience follow him, for what he has done is side with America over self indulgent politicos bent on domination and personal victory.

I shall end this with a picture: 

Saturday, June 22, 2013

Gays vs Divorce vs Christianity: a Facebook lie

Recently I found a supposed dialogue floating around Facebook. It claims to be from a pastor, who not named, at a church, which is not named, where a person attended, who are not named. The pastor gives an impassioned speech about homosexuality and divorce. He attempts to show that the Bible is loving toward Gays while hateful toward women who get a divorce. Well, let me just show you this piece of garbage.

Here is my rebuttal:
This is obviously either a fake, or uneducated pastor. The Bible states in Leviticus 20:13  that if men are sleeping together they are both to be put to death, no loopholes, not exceptions. At no point in the Bible is the act of divorce only punishable on the wife, that would be Islam. In fact, the Levitcal laws have rules about when divorce is allowed, which mostly have to deal with one partner being unfaithful and committing adultery; in doing so dissolves the marriage in God's Eyes the moment he OR she sleeps with someone other than their spouse. Of course the Levitical laws are old testament and we follow what the New Testaments says. The New Testament rule is that those who commit homosexual acts are facing spiritual death (Hell) and eternal separation from God, and those (Christians and Non-Christians alike) who condone sin and even applaud it are equally doomed Romans 1:32. The New Testament also says that adultery still dissolves a marriage in God's eyes, but that the guilty party may repent and even come back to their partner.

As you can, hopefully, tell this is not from a true Bible believing church. My guess is, if this is even real, this is from a church who are liberal minding and have allowed the World to dictate their religion while ignoring God.

My true opinion is that this is fake. It was created by someone who wanted to justify sin while discrediting the church. Though it supposedly lifts up the pastor in a way, it only tears down the church. If a pastor actually gave this little sermon, he would not only be walking away from God and the Bible, he would be leading the rest of his flock away as well. The bible is very strict on the teachers/leaders of the Church, for they hold sway over the followers and can lead God's people down a terrible path.

This is also another stab at the notion that the Church...not the hate-mongering against gays without justification. It subtlety injects the ideas, created by the World, that Christians are not only against the sin but are hateful of the sinner. There is this false notion floating around the Liberal world that Christians want to enact Jim Crow style laws against Gays, or worst Hitler themed ideas. (Note:Jim Crow Laws and Hitlers exterminations were both supported ideas by Leftists like Margaret Sanger, Charles Darwin, and the Democrat Party.) This is not the case, we simply do not want to live in a society that not only condones sin, but encourages it, and proclaims it holy and pure while denouncing what God says is Holy and pure. Homosexuality is a sin, end of story. Divorce is a sin, but that isn't the end story. In Muslim countries the wife would be stoned if found with another man, regardless of why she was found. But, in the Christian Bible, a divorce is perfectly legal of one partner is unfaithful. The unfaithful party has sinned and in the Old Testament could have been put to death, fortunate for us today, Jesus does not ask that. He simply wants the unfaithful partner to repent of his/her sin and accept the salvation through Jesus and the mercy and grace of God. My God has mercy, which means even though sin is condemnation to death, he will forgive so long as you ask honestly and believe faithfully.

Note: Though I said that the Levitcal laws are Old Testament and we follow the New Testament, the laws and what they say are right and/or wrong are still legit. There is just a new way to carry out punishments and repentance. With Jesus' death being the ultimate sacrifice for sin, the sin is covered and can be forgiven. So, instead of instant death sentences, and immediate enactment of punishments, we can repent and ask to be forgiven and God has promised that he will forgive and forget.

Sunday, June 16, 2013

Fathers Day

 Big government doesn’t like fatherhood. “The Life of Julia” was President Obama’s ad campaign last year advocating cradle to grave socialism for women. The expansion of welfare programs has seen out-of-wedlock births increase over 800% since 1960. And ever notice how lib Hollywood often portrays fathers and very rarely mothers as morons in films and on TV? Ads too. Their message is crystal clear, who needs fathers when government can be your daddy. Their message is 100% wrong. These stats come from the U.S. Dept. of Health, the CDC, the DOJ and others. Children from fatherless homes are: a) 5 times more likely to commit suicide b) 32 times more likely to run away c) 14 times more likely to commit rape d) 20 times more likely to develop behavioral problems e) 9 times more likely to drop out of high school f) 10 times more likely to become drug addicted & g) 20 times more likely to end up in prison There’s a reason why it’s called Father’s Day and not Sperm Donor’s Day. Fathers are and always will be important!

Saturday, June 8, 2013

Paula Priesse on Obama's honesty

Check out Paula Priesse on Facebook for some pithy political posts. She is smart and has a good handle on what is going on in today's political environment.

Sunday, May 5, 2013

A good example.

Recently the ideals of socialism have begun to be preached again by the lefties in our government and their sycophants in the media and their idiot protesters. The notions have been buried in bills and speeches produced by our pathetic excuse of a president and his butt kissers. The left has the idea that they are America's and the Worlds parents. That it is their holy duty to thrust upon us an idea that we do not want because in the long run we will see the logic and wisdom. That once it is part of our culture we will not understand how we lived without it.


There are tons of examples of why Socialism/Fascism/Communism have failed. Each has separate and unique ideals, but when looked at together, they also share a LOT of commonalities. And we can point to the failures of the Soviet Union as a good example of a system gone bust. We can point to the horrendous state of the Canadian health system or the French Health system. We can also look at the Well Fare state here in America, which in its core is a form of socialism. It is bloated, out of control, and crushing our economy is so many ways.

But, to give a good example that is often not spoken of, I want to talk about an unintended experiment in one nation that is now two nations and how one side picked socialism and the other a free market democracy. Welcome to Korea.

Back in the 19th century, that's the 1800's for those unable to keep up, Korea was conquered and controlled by the then Japanese Empire. That control lasted until WWII, when Japan lost and the Empire fell apart. Korea was cut loose and left to make its own way. Here comes the cold war. The United States entered with help from the U.N. and Soviet Russia entered as well. We, Americans, helped the South Koreans to build a free market economy and establish a leadership by election or as we call it a Constitutional Republic. North Korea was influenced and then designed by the Soviets to mirror a perfect Socialist society.

The results:

South Korea has a booming economy that has given us a great deal of technology in games, cell phones, cars, and many other items. They have a strong election system with one of the highest turn out rates in the world (over 70% step out to vote). And their population is fed, housed, and happy. Yes they have problems just like every society on earth, but they are free to voice their opinions and make their own decisions and most of all, work for their own pursuit of happiness.

North Korea: Their socialist leadership has taken a nose dive into maniacal dictatorship that has a God complex like the Pharaohs of old. Their people have exactly one TV and Radio station they can turn to, which only pipes in governmental propaganda. Their borders are sealed tight without mercy. Mass grave sights, most likely filled with citizens who opposed the government, have been seen through satellite photos. The people are starved if they don't obey, and they are barely fed if they do. Religion is frowned upon and Missionaries are safer in Iran. They proclaim they are a Democratic system, but when the former self proclaimed God leader of N. Korea died, his son just stepped into daddy's shoes, ensuring the dynasty survives. Here I must mention that Kim Jong il replaced his father when he passed on, so this makes the current leader a third gen of this dynasty in this so called Democracy. And to top it off, this is the poverty stricken, brainwashed country that regularly makes threats of nuclear strikes against foes of significant strength. Boy, doesn't that make you want to make your vacation plans now, and get ahead of the crowds!

So, this little experiment that has lasted 68 years has some conclusive results. Freedom vs. Totalitarianism through Socialism. And this is what our leadership wants us to look toward. I am sure that the people of North Korea were sold all the bologna that we are being fed today, that this sort of system will give them everything they want, everyone will be equal, paradise was just a soul away from happening. That would be your soul in payment to be clear. And they got what they bought, a system that controls their lives in so many ways that they cannot but accept or die.

A few years back a program on Television told of a doctor and his people who wanted to help the blind in third world countries. They approached N. Korea. They were allowed, only after much talking and practically begging, to go into North Korea to work. They wanted nothing but to help people. Some of these people have lived decades without being able to see. After the relatively simple procedures were done and the people were going to remove the eye patches to see for the first time, the Government stepped in. The first sight they must see is a painting of Kim Jong il and his father, ( Kim Jong Il was still alive at this time.) The people got in a large room and removed their bandages and opened their eyes to see the doctors, military men, cameras and the painting.  Then the people did something that just sent ice into my blood, they looked at the painting like one might look at a real angel and began to thank him for blessing them with sight. The level of brainwashing done in that country was made apparent at that moment. This is not a free nation by any standard. If you want to see the program it is called Explorer: Inside North Korea 

One last note: There are Liberals out there that will try to sell Socialism in its many forms to Christians by telling us that our Bible supports their logic. They may have some valid points, but they also are misleading. They are trying to sell you the bologna so you will allow the brainwashing to begin. History goes against them as well, in EVERY nation that has implemented any form of planned socialism, it has quickly removed religions freedom and highly encouraged atheism in its place. So, don't let them fool you. 

  I hope you learned something from this. As for me, I know that Socialism is bad.

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Dear Christians. (Non-Christians may read, but you are likely to be offended.)

                I want to share a term for you that is probably not one you have heard much. Moral Relativism: this when a person or even culture bases their morals on a common consensus instead of a supreme authority. This is a dangerous term actually, especially when it comes to Christianity. Moral Relativism leads to compromise, where you take God's word and Mans word and compromise. Often that compromise ends with Mans word being the dominant winner due to Satan's influence. The world, through its media, false religions, and broken moral codes will teach us from an early age that morals are fluid and can be changed on a whim. What is amoral at one time becomes moral later. The worst part of it is, churches have allowed Moral Relativism to explain the Bible instead of listening to God. Satan has convinced a lot of Churches that unless a person is sin free, he or she does not have the right to even mention Gods morals. We have that right, it is by supreme authority that we have that right. Otherwise, what Jesus did for us was in vain. For how can we witness about him when we cannot tell the truth of the scriptures?
                This, of course, is said today because of what is happening in this country. The courts are deciding what is and is not moral. Oh, the ways of explaining it might not sound like that, but when it comes down to the bare facts, that is the case. Satan loves to use laws to try and enforce an anti-biblical agenda. What it comes down to me is loyalty. Will I be loyal to God's inerrant word, or do I compromise by ignoring God and allowing a consensus to determine what is right and wrong?
                When the question comes up what is right/what is wrong when dealing with moral issues you should always search the scriptures. On the subject of Gay marriage, the scriptures are clear.

                Romans 1: 26 This is why God delivered them over to degrading passions. For even their females exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 The males in the same way also left natural relations with females and were inflamed in their lust for one another. Males committed shameless acts with males and received in their own persons the appropriate penalty of their error.

                On the question of abortion:
                Psalm 139:13 tells us that God “knit me together in my mother’s womb” and in Isaiah 46:3 God says “you whom I have upheld since you were conceived”

                For anyone who wants to argue that the morals of the Bible on these subjects and many others are unclear, they are only wanting you to ignore the many clear truths.
                God does not compromise; God does not take a consensus. He is omnipotent, omnipresent, perfect, good, and above all always right. When we compromise on Biblical truths, it is always the Bible that hurts. But, what truly hurts is our witness, our walk, and our lives.  God hurts, his heart aches for each Christian and non-Christian that give their morals over to the world and let the sin filled, Satan run world tell us what we can and cannot think. When we allow this and then accept it in the forms of allowing Gay ministers in our churches, condoning homosexual unions, and ignoring the murder of unborn children, we are no longer following God. Any church that accepts any or all of those is no House of God any longer and is as lost as an Atheists convention.  
                An important note, the church does not teach to hate the sinner but to hate the sin. I do not wish harm or bad things for those who consider themselves gay. I am mournful that they are walking down a path of ruin and do not truly know the one who can save them and give them eternal life. God teaches us to love our neighbor, be they saved or lost. But, he also asks us to be moral according to his codes, be loyal according to the Scriptures. Loving my neighbor means I WILL witness to him or her, I WILL tell them the good news, and I Will explain what sin is. Though the secular world will say that it is the Christian who is being judgmental of others, this is simply not the case. I am not using my judgment, but just speaking the truth of the Holy Scriptures. If the listener feels convicted because of that, then it is their guilt that is the problem, not me.
                The world tries to silence Christians by telling us we don't have the right to say what is and is not a sin, but the world does not follow its own rules. They will tell you want is morally right, according to the world, they will tell you who is wrong and who to judge, according to the world. They feel right in doing so, and they also feel right in keeping God and his followers as silent as possible. Sorry, it won't work. God is not someone you can silence by a law, or through consensus. He is not subject to Moral Relativism. God is the authority of all Creation. All who live and die are under him. One day all will be before him, and he will judge them then according to his laws, not theirs.

                I end with one of my favorite Bible verses:
                Psalm 11:3
"When the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do?”
                While we compromise and use moral relativism to explain away scripture so that the church conforms to the worlds views, the foundations are beginning to crack. Churches that allow gay marriage, accept homosexual leadership, and allow the idea of abortion to not mean killing a child, then they have taken hammer to their own foundations. They no longer worship God, and he is no longer blessing them in their mission.

New Blog

Hello all. This is a new blog that I am going to use to soapbox on some of my feelings and thoughts. I will probably offend some and I know I will get some hate from others. But, if you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything.

So, to get the ball rolling. Who am I? I am a Christian Conservative Southern Baptist who believes in the Grace Message of Jesus Christ. I believe that the Bible is the inerrant word of God and that it should be read as such. I believe in a Republican/Tea Party attitude about governing.

So, if that didn't offend you, you might like what I have to say. Otherwise, grab you hats, this is going to be a bumpy ride.